Last Comments

snorkel (Data Warehouse / …): Oracle seems like a huge …
frak (Article Bot is fi…): Well thanks for being the…
random (Article Bot is fi…): Curious Statement from th…
frak (Article Bot Spyin…): For the answer see this u…
Bob (Pivot 1.30 Alpha.…): And this is what a commen…

Archives

01 Nov - 30 Nov 2007
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2007
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2006
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2006
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2006
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2006
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2006
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2006
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2006
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2006
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2005
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2005
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2005
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2005
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2005
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2005

Miscellany

Powered by Pivot - 1.40.5: 'Dreadwind' 
XML: RSS Feed 
XML: Atom Feed 

« All your really big q… | Home | John Lennon's Imagine… »

Webrings - Can they be brought back to life?

Jim's hit on something simple here.  Webrings used to rule the roost for traffic.  I used to - and really still do - love them.  There's one problem in todays SEO climate:  you get no link points (goes back to webrings.com or whoever runs it)

His idea if you changed the code so links were worth something it would be good SEO-wise (particularly with the death of various link-swap strategies).

Jim:  I don't think this is SPAM.  Google has been cool with Webrings version 1.0.  Why would they have a problem with a webring that passed linkage?

In short webrings define a "neighbourhood" and as a result I think Google will appreciate that.



No comments:


No trackbacks:

Trackback link:

Please enable javascript to generate a trackback url


  
Remember personal info?

/ Textile

this is to stop spam bots causing me pain.
 

  (Register your username / Log in)

Notify:
Hide email:

Small print: All html tags except <b> and <i> will be removed from your comment. You can make links by just typing the url or mail-address.